![]() ![]() If we define ‘cooperative’ as the ability of a quantum device to systematically reproduce its errors, then, error mitigation is defined as a method to attenuate errors when applied to a cooperative error-prone device. If we wish to avoid using additional hardware, we need a different method altogether. This redundancy necessitates additional hardware in order to be implementable. 1.1 Correction versus mitigationĮrror correction has been described as a procedure of protecting quantum computation against noise or errors, by encoding redundant information to the process. In this article, we propose and test a new method for it. Another attempt at removing the erroneous computation obstacle is error mitigation. Error correction is difficult to implement on current devices due to its hardware requirements. To tackle this obstacle to some extent, error correction had been proposed. One operational obstacle is the presence of both known (e.g. noise, decoherence) and unknown causes that render the computation erroneous. ![]() The implementations bring with them operational obstacles. Despite these, devices had been developed and small problems have been implemented. implementation of reversibility and loss of coherence, some are found as we progress. While some of the development obstacles had been pointed early on, i.e. The road of developing and operating devices that would enable quantum computation has been and continues to be full of obstacles. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |